Prelims · CatchweightID · EE787667-6B44-42F7-A57A-B1D908EFFA4B
Unranked · Catchweight
Jim Miller
"A-10"
39-19-0 · Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu
Unranked · Catchweight
Terrance McKinney
18-9-0 · MMA
Win Probability Model · v4.2
Miller
44%
Edge12%
McKinney
56%
Skill Comparison
83
96
Striking
77
95
Wrestling
78
68
Cardio
48
73
Takedown Defense
90
81
Chin Durability
Physical Attributes
MillerMetricMcKinney
5' 8"Height5' 10"
70.9"Reach73.5"
43Age32
—Stance—
74%Finish Rate100%
Career Records
MillerMetricMcKinney
7Wins by KO/TKO9
22Wins by Submission9
—First-Round Finishes17
2.92Sig. Strikes / Min6.83
3.43Sig. Strikes Absorbed / Min4.07
42%Striking Accuracy56%
57%Striking Defense43%
0.20Knockdown Avg / 15 min1.09
1.49Takedowns / 15 min3.27
45%Takedown Accuracy40%
48%Takedown Defense73%
1.70Submissions / 15 min1.82
09:38Avg. Fight Time02:45
Strike Distribution
Miller
Sig. Strikes by Target
Primary Target Head
Head
59%
Body
20%
Leg
21%
Sig. Strikes by Position
Standing72%
Clinch15%
Ground14%Primary Position Standing
McKinney
Sig. Strikes by Target
Primary Target Head
Head
86%
Body
14%
Leg
0%
Sig. Strikes by Position
Standing47%Clinch12%Ground41%Primary Position Standing
Fight Intel
Miller
Strengths
- Jim Miller leads in significant-strike defense (57% vs 43%)
- Jim Miller's path improves if early exchanges establish tempo
- Clean defense-to-offense transitions can protect Jim Miller's preferred range
Weaknesses
- Terrance McKinney leads in significant-strike pace (6.83 vs 2.92)
- Terrance McKinney leads in takedown activity per 15 minutes (3.27 vs 1.49)
Opportunities
- Establish the preferred phase early
- Turn measurable advantages into repeatable scoring sequences
Threats
- Terrance McKinney changing the fight phase
- Terrance McKinney leads in takedown defense (73% vs 48%)
McKinney
Strengths
- Terrance McKinney leads in significant-strike pace (6.83 vs 2.92)
- Terrance McKinney leads in takedown activity per 15 minutes (3.27 vs 1.49)
- Terrance McKinney leads in takedown defense (73% vs 48%)
Weaknesses
- Jim Miller leads in significant-strike defense (57% vs 43%)
- Jim Miller's path improves if early exchanges establish tempo
Opportunities
- Force Jim Miller away from the projected win condition
- Exploit transitions after the first defensive layer
Threats
- Jim Miller leads in significant-strike defense (57% vs 43%)
- Clean defense-to-offense transitions can protect Jim Miller's preferred range