Kurtis Campbell vs Trevor PeekUFC Fight Night: Hooker vs Parnasse

Kurtis Campbell vs Trevor Peek — Peso pluma — estaba programada para el sábado, 5 de septiembre de 2026 en UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs Parnasse en Accor Arena, Paris. Resultado oficial aún no registrado. Picks Terminal cubre el enfrentamiento con una estimación de probabilidad de victoria, un desglose del enfrentamiento e inteligencia extraída de fuentes públicas.

Preliminares · FeatherweightID · 32AACB8B-EDB2-4DDD-AD99-424E55A9E839

Sin ranking · Featherweight

Kurtis Campbell

"The Pink Panther"

8-1-0 · MMA

Trevor Peek

Sin ranking · Featherweight

Trevor Peek

9-3-0 · MMA

Modelo de probabilidad de victoria · v4.2

Campbell

48%

Ventaja4%

Peek

52%

Comparación de habilidades

71
70
Golpeo
56
56
Lucha
69
69
Cardio
50
53
Defensa de derribos
73
71
Resistencia de mentón

Atributos físicos

CampbellMétricaPeek
5' 9"Estatura5' 9"
72"Alcance70"
24Edad31
—Postura—
75%Tasa de finalización—

Récord de carrera

CampbellMétricaPeek
5Victorias por KO/TKO8
1Victorias por sumisión—
4Finalizaciones en 1.º asalto6
3.50Golpes significativos / min4.39
2.63Golpes significativos recibidos / min3.88
51%Defensa de golpeo44%
8.76Promedio de knockdowns / 15 min1.45
50%Defensa de derribo53%
0Sumisiones / 15 min0
03:26Tiempo promedio de pelea12:06

Distribución de golpes

Campbell

Golpes significativos por objetivo

Objetivo principal Cabeza

Cabeza

67%

Cuerpo

21%

Pierna

13%
Golpes significativos por objetivo — Campbell

Golpes significativos por posición

De pie — 71%De pie71%
Clinch — 17%Clinch17%
Suelo — 13%Suelo13%

Posición principal De pie

Peek

Golpes significativos por objetivo

Objetivo principal Cabeza

Cabeza

60%

Cuerpo

25%

Pierna

15%
Golpes significativos por objetivo — Peek

Golpes significativos por posición

De pie — 72%De pie72%
Clinch — 18%Clinch18%
Suelo — 11%Suelo11%

Posición principal De pie

Inteligencia de la pelea

Consenso público

— Datos de consenso no disponibles —

Últimas noticias

— Sin noticias recientes —

Campbell

Fortalezas

  • SApM edge (2.63 vs 3.88)

Debilidades

  • Potentially incomplete UFC sample
  • Can be punished when the preferred phase breaks down

Oportunidades

  • Establish the preferred phase
  • Build repeatable offense over time

Amenazas

  • Trevor Peek changing the fight phase
  • High-impact momentum swing
Peek

Fortalezas

  • SLpM edge (4.39 vs 3.5)
  • TDD edge (53 vs 50)

Debilidades

  • Potentially incomplete UFC sample
  • Can be punished when the preferred phase breaks down

Oportunidades

  • Establish the preferred phase
  • Build repeatable offense over time

Amenazas

  • Kurtis Campbell changing the fight phase
  • High-impact momentum swing

Análisis detallado

El modelo favorece a Peek
Ventajas clave
  • Ventaja en SLpM (4.39 vs 3.5)
  • Ventaja en defensa de derribos (53 vs 50)
Posibles riesgos
  • Las muestras limitadas reducen la certeza donde los índices oficiales de UFC no están disponibles.
  • Kurtis Campbell puede superar al modelo forzando una fase de pelea distinta.
  • Un solo intercambio de alto impacto puede anular la base estadística.
Análisis del modelo

Trevor Peek tiene la ruta estadística y estilística más repetible, mientras que Kurtis Campbell mantiene un camino creíble si la pelea se asienta en su fase preferida.

Pronóstico

Se espera que Kurtis Campbell y Trevor Peek pongan a prueba la fase principal del enfrentamiento desde el principio. Se proyecta que Trevor Peek genere la ofensiva más sostenible, pero la ruta opuesta sigue vigente donde el tamaño de la muestra en UFC es reducido.

Las valoraciones de habilidades, la probabilidad de victoria, las ventajas, los riesgos y el pronóstico son estimaciones generadas por el modelo a partir de perfiles públicos de peleadores — no son estadísticas oficiales de UFC ni garantías de resultado.

Desglose del enfrentamiento

Este enfrentamiento de peso pluma depende del control de las fases y del volumen de golpeo sostenible. Los índices oficiales disponibles de la UFC producen una inclinación del modelo analítico del 52% hacia Trevor Peek. La confianza se reduce para los debutantes y peleadores con muestras pequeñas en UFC, y los valores faltantes se dejan deliberadamente como nulos.

Análisis completo de la pelea

4 min de lectura · Actualizado 7 de septiembre de 2026

Este análisis extendido aún no está traducido; se muestra la versión en inglés.

The featherweight division takes center stage at the Accor Arena in Paris on September 5, 2026, as Kurtis Campbell faces Trevor Peek at UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs Parnasse. This matchup features two competitors with identical heights of 175 cm, yet they bring contrasting professional experiences to the cage. While Trevor Peek enters with a record of 9-3-0, Kurtis Campbell brings an 8-1-0 mark. The statistical model suggests a competitive encounter where phase control and sustainable output will dictate the eventual winner.

Striking Dynamics and Impact

In the striking department, Trevor Peek holds a notable activity advantage with 4.39 strikes landed per minute compared to 3.5 for Kurtis Campbell. However, Campbell demonstrates a significant edge in raw power metrics, posting a knockdown average of 8.76, which dwarfs the 1.45 average maintained by Peek. Campbell targets the head with 67 percent of his significant strikes, while Peek distributes his offense more, landing 25 percent to the body and 15 percent to the legs. Peek absorbs more damage, evidenced by a strikes absorbed per minute rate of 3.88, while Campbell maintains a lower rate of 2.63. This suggests that while Peek is more active, Campbell is the more efficient and dangerous counter-striker in high-impact exchanges.

Grappling and Defensive Efficiency

The wrestling and defensive metrics for this bout are remarkably close, with both fighters assigned a wrestling grade of 56. Trevor Peek holds a slight statistical advantage in takedown defense at 53 percent, marginally better than the 50 percent takedown defense recorded by Kurtis Campbell. Neither fighter has established a submission average in the UFC, with both sitting at 0. Campbell has secured 1 win by submission in his career, whereas Peek has 0. The defensive striking percentages also show a divide; Campbell successfully defends 51 percent of incoming strikes, while Peek tracks at 44 percent. This indicates that Peek relies more on his chin durability, rated at 71, to navigate exchanges rather than pure defensive evasion.

Pace and Fight Duration

There is a massive discrepancy in the average fight time between these two athletes. Kurtis Campbell typically finishes his business early, with an average fight time of 03:26. In contrast, Trevor Peek has shown the ability to sustain his pace over much longer durations, averaging 12:06 per contest. This difference is reflected in their career results; Peek has 8 wins by knockout but 0 wins by decision, while Campbell has 5 wins by knockout and 2 wins by decision. Campbell possesses a finish rate of 75 percent, suggesting he is most dangerous in the opening minutes. If the fight transcends the first round, the experience of Peek in longer bouts may become a deciding factor in the outcome.

Physical Attributes and Reach

Physical parity is a hallmark of this featherweight contest, as both men stand exactly 175 cm tall. A slight discrepancy exists in the reach department, where Kurtis Campbell holds a 72 inch reach compared to the 70 inch reach of Trevor Peek. This two-inch advantage may assist Campbell in maintaining his strike defense of 51 percent by keeping Peek at the end of his punches. Age also plays a role in the physical trajectory of this fight; Campbell is the younger athlete at 24, while Peek is 31. The model notes that Campbell's chin durability is rated at 73, slightly higher than the 71 rating for Peek, which could be critical given the high knockdown average Campbell brings into the cage.

Statistical Model Projections

The analytical model provides a 52 percent probability lean toward Trevor Peek, leaving Kurtis Campbell with a 48 percent win probability. This narrow margin is driven by Peek's superior strikes landed per minute and his slight edge in takedown defense. However, the model highlights that limited samples for Campbell reduce certainty where official UFC rates are unavailable. The potential for one high-impact exchange to override the statistical baseline is high, especially given Campbell's knockdown average of 8.76. While Peek has the more repeatable statistical route through volume, Campbell retains a credible path to victory if he can force the fight into a high-variance striking exchange early in the first round.

Veredicto del modelo

The model identifies Trevor Peek as the fighter with the more sustainable offensive output, supported by a 4.39 strikes landed per minute rate and a 52 percent win probability. However, Kurtis Campbell remains a live threat due to his 8.76 knockdown average and superior reach of 72 inches. The fight hinges on whether Peek can survive the early 03:26 average fight time window where Campbell is most lethal. If Peek utilizes his 53 percent takedown defense to keep the fight standing and drags the contest into deep water, his experience in longer bouts should prevail.

Preguntas frecuentes

Who has the higher striking volume in this matchup?
Trevor Peek maintains the higher volume, landing 4.39 strikes per minute. Kurtis Campbell lands at a rate of 3.5 strikes per minute but possesses a significantly higher knockdown average of 8.76, indicating higher impact per strike landed.
How do the fighters' defensive statistics compare?
Kurtis Campbell leads in striking defense, turning away 51 percent of attempts, while Trevor Peek defends 44 percent. In grappling, Peek has a slight advantage with a 53 percent takedown defense compared to 50 percent for Campbell.
What are the primary keys to victory for each fighter?
For Trevor Peek, the key is utilizing his 12:06 average fight time experience and superior volume. For Kurtis Campbell, the path to victory lies in his 75 percent finish rate and his ability to find a knockout early in the bout.

Análisis informativo generado a partir de estadísticas públicas y revisado con controles de calidad automáticos. No es asesoramiento de apuestas.

Picks Terminal Semanal

Un informe conciso de NFL y UFC/MMA — previas los lunes, actualizaciones los viernes.

Enfrentamientos clave, señales del modelo y las historias que vale la pena conocer en ambos deportes. Gratis, sin relleno, cancelas con un clic.