Kurtis Campbell vs Trevor PeekUFC Fight Night: Hooker vs Parnasse

Kurtis Campbell vs Trevor Peek — Featherweight — was scheduled for Saturday, September 5, 2026 at UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs Parnasse in Accor Arena, Paris. Official result not yet recorded. Picks Terminal covers the matchup with a win-probability estimate, a matchup breakdown and fight intel drawn from public sources.

Prelims · FeatherweightID · 32AACB8B-EDB2-4DDD-AD99-424E55A9E839

Unranked · Featherweight

Kurtis Campbell

"The Pink Panther"

8-1-0 · MMA

Trevor Peek

Unranked · Featherweight

Trevor Peek

9-3-0 · MMA

Win Probability Model · v4.2

Campbell

48%

Edge4%

Peek

52%

Skill Comparison

71
70
Striking
56
56
Wrestling
69
69
Cardio
50
53
Takedown Defense
73
71
Chin Durability

Physical Attributes

CampbellMetricPeek
5' 9"Height5' 9"
72"Reach70"
24Age31
—Stance—
75%Finish Rate—

Career Records

CampbellMetricPeek
5Wins by KO/TKO8
1Wins by Submission—
4First-Round Finishes6
3.50Sig. Strikes / Min4.39
2.63Sig. Strikes Absorbed / Min3.88
51%Striking Defense44%
8.76Knockdown Avg / 15 min1.45
50%Takedown Defense53%
0Submissions / 15 min0
03:26Avg. Fight Time12:06

Strike Distribution

Campbell

Sig. Strikes by Target

Primary Target Head

Head

67%

Body

21%

Leg

13%
Sig. Strikes by Target — Campbell

Sig. Strikes by Position

Standing — 71%Standing71%
Clinch — 17%Clinch17%
Ground — 13%Ground13%

Primary Position Standing

Peek

Sig. Strikes by Target

Primary Target Head

Head

60%

Body

25%

Leg

15%
Sig. Strikes by Target — Peek

Sig. Strikes by Position

Standing — 72%Standing72%
Clinch — 18%Clinch18%
Ground — 11%Ground11%

Primary Position Standing

Fight Intel

Public Consensus

— Consensus data unavailable —

Latest News

— No recent news —

Campbell

Strengths

  • SApM edge (2.63 vs 3.88)

Weaknesses

  • Potentially incomplete UFC sample
  • Can be punished when the preferred phase breaks down

Opportunities

  • Establish the preferred phase
  • Build repeatable offense over time

Threats

  • Trevor Peek changing the fight phase
  • High-impact momentum swing
Peek

Strengths

  • SLpM edge (4.39 vs 3.5)
  • TDD edge (53 vs 50)

Weaknesses

  • Potentially incomplete UFC sample
  • Can be punished when the preferred phase breaks down

Opportunities

  • Establish the preferred phase
  • Build repeatable offense over time

Threats

  • Kurtis Campbell changing the fight phase
  • High-impact momentum swing

In-Depth Analysis

Model favors Peek
Key Advantages
  • SLpM edge (4.39 vs 3.5)
  • TDD edge (53 vs 50)
Potential Concerns
  • Limited samples reduce certainty where official UFC rates are unavailable.
  • Kurtis Campbell can outperform the model by forcing a different fight phase.
  • One high-impact exchange can override the statistical baseline.
AI Analysis

Trevor Peek has the more repeatable statistical and stylistic route, while Kurtis Campbell retains a credible path if the fight settles in the preferred phase.

Forecast

Expect Kurtis Campbell and Trevor Peek to test the matchup's primary phase early. Trevor Peek is projected to create the more sustainable offense, but the opposing route remains live wherever UFC sample size is thin.

Skill ratings, win probability, advantages, concerns, and forecast are AI-generated predictions based on scraped fighter profiles — not official UFC stats or guarantees.

Matchup Breakdown

This featherweight matchup turns on phase control and sustainable output. The available official UFC rates produce a 52% analyst-model lean toward Trevor Peek. Confidence is reduced for debutants and fighters with small UFC samples, and missing values are deliberately left null.

Full fight analysis

4 min read · Updated September 7, 2026

The featherweight division takes center stage at the Accor Arena in Paris on September 5, 2026, as Kurtis Campbell faces Trevor Peek at UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs Parnasse. This matchup features two competitors with identical heights of 175 cm, yet they bring contrasting professional experiences to the cage. While Trevor Peek enters with a record of 9-3-0, Kurtis Campbell brings an 8-1-0 mark. The statistical model suggests a competitive encounter where phase control and sustainable output will dictate the eventual winner.

Striking Dynamics and Impact

In the striking department, Trevor Peek holds a notable activity advantage with 4.39 strikes landed per minute compared to 3.5 for Kurtis Campbell. However, Campbell demonstrates a significant edge in raw power metrics, posting a knockdown average of 8.76, which dwarfs the 1.45 average maintained by Peek. Campbell targets the head with 67 percent of his significant strikes, while Peek distributes his offense more, landing 25 percent to the body and 15 percent to the legs. Peek absorbs more damage, evidenced by a strikes absorbed per minute rate of 3.88, while Campbell maintains a lower rate of 2.63. This suggests that while Peek is more active, Campbell is the more efficient and dangerous counter-striker in high-impact exchanges.

Grappling and Defensive Efficiency

The wrestling and defensive metrics for this bout are remarkably close, with both fighters assigned a wrestling grade of 56. Trevor Peek holds a slight statistical advantage in takedown defense at 53 percent, marginally better than the 50 percent takedown defense recorded by Kurtis Campbell. Neither fighter has established a submission average in the UFC, with both sitting at 0. Campbell has secured 1 win by submission in his career, whereas Peek has 0. The defensive striking percentages also show a divide; Campbell successfully defends 51 percent of incoming strikes, while Peek tracks at 44 percent. This indicates that Peek relies more on his chin durability, rated at 71, to navigate exchanges rather than pure defensive evasion.

Pace and Fight Duration

There is a massive discrepancy in the average fight time between these two athletes. Kurtis Campbell typically finishes his business early, with an average fight time of 03:26. In contrast, Trevor Peek has shown the ability to sustain his pace over much longer durations, averaging 12:06 per contest. This difference is reflected in their career results; Peek has 8 wins by knockout but 0 wins by decision, while Campbell has 5 wins by knockout and 2 wins by decision. Campbell possesses a finish rate of 75 percent, suggesting he is most dangerous in the opening minutes. If the fight transcends the first round, the experience of Peek in longer bouts may become a deciding factor in the outcome.

Physical Attributes and Reach

Physical parity is a hallmark of this featherweight contest, as both men stand exactly 175 cm tall. A slight discrepancy exists in the reach department, where Kurtis Campbell holds a 72 inch reach compared to the 70 inch reach of Trevor Peek. This two-inch advantage may assist Campbell in maintaining his strike defense of 51 percent by keeping Peek at the end of his punches. Age also plays a role in the physical trajectory of this fight; Campbell is the younger athlete at 24, while Peek is 31. The model notes that Campbell's chin durability is rated at 73, slightly higher than the 71 rating for Peek, which could be critical given the high knockdown average Campbell brings into the cage.

Statistical Model Projections

The analytical model provides a 52 percent probability lean toward Trevor Peek, leaving Kurtis Campbell with a 48 percent win probability. This narrow margin is driven by Peek's superior strikes landed per minute and his slight edge in takedown defense. However, the model highlights that limited samples for Campbell reduce certainty where official UFC rates are unavailable. The potential for one high-impact exchange to override the statistical baseline is high, especially given Campbell's knockdown average of 8.76. While Peek has the more repeatable statistical route through volume, Campbell retains a credible path to victory if he can force the fight into a high-variance striking exchange early in the first round.

Model verdict

The model identifies Trevor Peek as the fighter with the more sustainable offensive output, supported by a 4.39 strikes landed per minute rate and a 52 percent win probability. However, Kurtis Campbell remains a live threat due to his 8.76 knockdown average and superior reach of 72 inches. The fight hinges on whether Peek can survive the early 03:26 average fight time window where Campbell is most lethal. If Peek utilizes his 53 percent takedown defense to keep the fight standing and drags the contest into deep water, his experience in longer bouts should prevail.

Frequently asked questions

Who has the higher striking volume in this matchup?
Trevor Peek maintains the higher volume, landing 4.39 strikes per minute. Kurtis Campbell lands at a rate of 3.5 strikes per minute but possesses a significantly higher knockdown average of 8.76, indicating higher impact per strike landed.
How do the fighters' defensive statistics compare?
Kurtis Campbell leads in striking defense, turning away 51 percent of attempts, while Trevor Peek defends 44 percent. In grappling, Peek has a slight advantage with a 53 percent takedown defense compared to 50 percent for Campbell.
What are the primary keys to victory for each fighter?
For Trevor Peek, the key is utilizing his 12:06 average fight time experience and superior volume. For Kurtis Campbell, the path to victory lies in his 75 percent finish rate and his ability to find a knockout early in the bout.

Informational analysis generated from public statistics and screened by automated quality checks. Not wagering advice.

More from this card

Other published long-form breakdowns from the same event.

Picks Terminal Weekly

A concise NFL and UFC/MMA briefing — Monday previews, Friday updates.

Key matchups, model signals, and the stories worth knowing across both sports. Free, no fluff, one-click unsubscribe.