
Away
Minnesota Vikings
1-0

Home
Chicago Bears
1-0
Model Win Probability
Minnesota Vikings · Away
52%
Chicago Bears · Home
48%
Team Efficiency Comparison
0–100 league percentile across all 32 teams. Defensive ratings are inverted so a higher number always means a better unit.
Blended Team Metrics
| MIN | Metric | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| -0.087 | EPA / Play | 0.178 |
| 40.5% | Success Rate | 48.3% |
| -0.086 | Dropback EPA | 0.243 |
| -0.075 | Rush EPA | 0.096 |
| 7.2% | Explosive Play Rate | 11.2% |
| 39.7% | 3rd Down Conversion | 51.2% |
| 75.6% | Red Zone TD Rate | 87.3% |
| -0.122 | Def. EPA / Play Allowed | 0.067 |
| 23.0% | Pressure Rate | 13.0% |
Blend: 70% prior full season, 30% current season to date. Metrics without enough data are shown as “—”, never as zero.
Game Context
- Venue
- Soldier Field
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 20, 1:00 PM ET
- Roof
- outdoors
- Surface
- grass
- Away rest
- 7 days
- Home rest
- 7 days
- Site
- Chicago Bears home game
Player Impact
Carson Wentz
QB2026 Week 1
- CMP/ATT
- 12/19
- Pass yds
- 133
- Pass TD
- 3
- INT
- 0
- Y/A
- 7
- Sacks
- 3
Jordan Mason
RB2026 Week 1
- Carries
- 15
- Rush yds
- 59
- YPC
- 3.9
- Rush TD
- 1
- Targets
- 0
- Rec
- 0
- Rush share
- 44.1%
Aaron Jones
RB2026 Week 1
- Carries
- 12
- Rush yds
- 40
- YPC
- 3.3
- Rush TD
- 1
- Targets
- 1
- Rec
- 0
- Rush share
- 35.3%
Justin Jefferson
WR2026 Week 1
- Targets
- 9
- Rec
- 8
- Rec yds
- 92
- YPR
- 11.5
- Rec TD
- 2
- Target share
- 39.1%
T.J. Hockenson
TE2026 Week 1
- Targets
- 5
- Rec
- 4
- Rec yds
- 36
- YPR
- 9
- Rec TD
- 1
- Target share
- 21.7%
Away · Minnesota Vikings
Carson Wentz
QB2026 Week 1
- CMP/ATT
- 12/19
- Pass yds
- 133
- Pass TD
- 3
- INT
- 0
- Y/A
- 7
- Sacks
- 3
Jordan Mason
RB2026 Week 1
- Carries
- 15
- Rush yds
- 59
- YPC
- 3.9
- Rush TD
- 1
- Targets
- 0
- Rec
- 0
- Rush share
- 44.1%
Aaron Jones
RB2026 Week 1
- Carries
- 12
- Rush yds
- 40
- YPC
- 3.3
- Rush TD
- 1
- Targets
- 1
- Rec
- 0
- Rush share
- 35.3%
Justin Jefferson
WR2026 Week 1
- Targets
- 9
- Rec
- 8
- Rec yds
- 92
- YPR
- 11.5
- Rec TD
- 2
- Target share
- 39.1%
T.J. Hockenson
TE2026 Week 1
- Targets
- 5
- Rec
- 4
- Rec yds
- 36
- YPR
- 9
- Rec TD
- 1
- Target share
- 21.7%
Home · Chicago Bears
Caleb Williams
QB2026 Week 1
- CMP/ATT
- 21/29
- Pass yds
- 269
- Pass TD
- 2
- INT
- 0
- Y/A
- 9.3
- Sacks
- 2
D'Andre Swift
RB2026 Week 1
- Carries
- 18
- Rush yds
- 124
- YPC
- 6.9
- Rush TD
- 3
- Targets
- 1
- Rec
- 1
- Rush share
- 46.2%
Kyle Monangai
RB2026 Week 1
- Carries
- 10
- Rush yds
- 100
- YPC
- 10
- Rush TD
- 1
- Targets
- 2
- Rec
- 2
- Rush share
- 25.6%
Kalif Raymond
WR2026 Week 1
- Targets
- 9
- Rec
- 8
- Rec yds
- 84
- YPR
- 10.5
- Rec TD
- 0
- Target share
- 34.6%
Luther Burden III
WR2026 Week 1
- Targets
- 5
- Rec
- 5
- Rec yds
- 63
- YPR
- 12.6
- Rec TD
- 0
- Target share
- 19.2%
Scoring by Quarter
Sample · 1 gameAway · Minnesota Vikings
Home · Chicago Bears
Small sample — treat quarter splits as descriptive context, not a trend.
Latest News
- Kyler Murray remained limited in Thursday's practice.
NBC Sports ProFootballTalk · 3h ago · MIN
- Kyler Murray remained limited in Thursday's practice.
Yahoo Sports NFL · 3h ago · MIN
- Vikings-Bears Second Injury Report
Yahoo Sports NFL · 3h ago · CHI / MIN
Analytical Angles
Passing edge · CHI
passingChicago Bears ranks in the 94th percentile for passing against the 13th percentile opposite, a 81-point separation in the blended team profile.
Rushing edge · CHI
rushingChicago Bears ranks in the 100th percentile for rushing against the 35th percentile opposite, a 65-point separation in the blended team profile.
Defense edge · MIN
efficiencyMinnesota Vikings ranks in the 97th percentile for defense against the 23th percentile opposite, a 74-point separation in the blended team profile.
Quarter scoring tendency · MIN
scoringMinnesota Vikings produced 22 of 39 points in the fourth quarter across 1 completed 2026 game — a one-game sample, so read it as description rather than trend.
Statistical context only. Picks Terminal publishes matchup analysis, not wagering advice.
Keys to the Game
- Pass Rush: Minnesota Vikings rate 100/100 against Chicago Bears at 19/100 (Pressure Rate 23.0%).
- Defense: Minnesota Vikings rate 97/100 against Chicago Bears at 23/100 (Def. EPA / Play Allowed -0.122).
What Could Flip It
- Offense: Chicago Bears rate 100/100 against Minnesota Vikings at 16/100 (EPA / Play 0.178).
- Passing: Chicago Bears rate 94/100 against Minnesota Vikings at 13/100 (Dropback EPA 0.243).
- Rushing: Chicago Bears rate 100/100 against Minnesota Vikings at 35/100 (Rush EPA 0.096).
- Week 2 efficiency is blended 70% from the 2025 full season and 30% from 2026 play to date, so recent form is intentionally underweighted.
Model Analysis
Minnesota Vikings visit Chicago Bears in Week 2 of the 2026 regular season. The Picks Terminal Elo baseline makes Minnesota Vikings the 52% side, with Chicago Bears at 48%.
Where Minnesota Vikings grade out ahead: Pass Rush: Minnesota Vikings rate 100/100 against Chicago Bears at 19/100 (Pressure Rate 23.0%). Defense: Minnesota Vikings rate 97/100 against Chicago Bears at 23/100 (Def. EPA / Play Allowed -0.122).
Counter-edges for Chicago Bears: Offense: Chicago Bears rate 100/100 against Minnesota Vikings at 16/100 (EPA / Play 0.178). Passing: Chicago Bears rate 94/100 against Minnesota Vikings at 13/100 (Dropback EPA 0.243). Rushing: Chicago Bears rate 100/100 against Minnesota Vikings at 35/100 (Rush EPA 0.096).
All ratings are league-wide percentiles across the 32 teams, computed from public nflverse play-by-play. Metrics without sufficient data are shown as unavailable rather than zero, and efficiency figures are matchup context — the probability itself comes from result-based Elo only.
Forecast
The model projects Minnesota Vikings to win this game 52% of the time. That is a slim edge, and it reflects game results through the completed weeks of 2026 rather than any market price.
Sources & Methodology
Win probability: pt-nfl-elo-v0.1 — a result-based Elo baseline (teams start at 1500, K = 20, +45 Elo home-field, 0 at neutral sites) trained on completed game results only. Team efficiency metrics are league-wide percentiles from public play-by-play and are matchup context, not model inputs. No external market data of any kind is used anywhere on this page.