Alonzo Menifield vs Iwo BaraniewskiUFC 331: Van vs Pantoja 2

Alonzo Menifield vs Iwo Baraniewski — Light Heavyweight — is scheduled for Saturday, September 19, 2026 at UFC 331: Van vs Pantoja 2 in Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles. Picks Terminal covers the matchup with a win-probability estimate, a matchup breakdown and fight intel drawn from public sources.

Main Card · Light HeavyweightID · B09637AB-3E08-4657-B3C9-F275FB26CE61
Alonzo Menifield

Rank #14 · Light Heavyweight

Alonzo Menifield

"Atomic"

18-6-1 · Freestyle

Unranked · Light Heavyweight

Iwo Baraniewski

"Rudy"

9-0-0 · Judo

Win Probability Model · v4.2

Menifield

39%

Edge22%

Baraniewski

61%

Skill Comparison

72
88
Striking
61
65
Wrestling
69
69
Cardio
78
100
Takedown Defense
71
61
Chin Durability

Physical Attributes

MenifieldMetricBaraniewski
6' 0"Height6' 0"
76"Reach73.5"
38Age27
Stance
78%Finish Rate100%

Career Records

MenifieldMetricBaraniewski
11Wins by KO/TKO7
3Wins by Submission2
11First-Round Finishes9
3.84Sig. Strikes / Min11.35
3.81Sig. Strikes Absorbed / Min8.65
51%Striking Defense53%
0.48Knockdown Avg / 15 min0
78%Takedown Defense100%
0.19Submissions / 15 min0
07:24Avg. Fight Time00:56

Strike Distribution

Menifield

Sig. Strikes by Target

Primary Target Head

Head

82%

Body

10%

Leg

8%
Sig. Strikes by Target — Menifield

Sig. Strikes by Position

Standing — 75%Standing75%
Clinch — 13%Clinch13%
Ground — 12%Ground12%

Primary Position Standing

Baraniewski

Sig. Strikes by Target

Primary Target Head

Head

79%

Body

10%

Leg

12%
Sig. Strikes by Target — Baraniewski

Sig. Strikes by Position

Standing — 31%Standing31%
Clinch — 14%Clinch14%
Ground — 55%Ground55%

Primary Position Ground

Fight Intel

Public Consensus

Consensus data unavailable

Latest News

No recent news

Menifield

Strengths

  • SApM edge (3.81 vs 8.65)
  • Sub/15 edge (0.19 vs 0)

Weaknesses

  • Potentially incomplete UFC sample
  • Can be punished when the preferred phase breaks down

Opportunities

  • Establish the preferred phase
  • Build repeatable offense over time

Threats

  • Iwo Baraniewski changing the fight phase
  • High-impact momentum swing
Baraniewski

Strengths

  • SLpM edge (11.35 vs 3.84)
  • TDD edge (100 vs 78)

Weaknesses

  • Potentially incomplete UFC sample
  • Can be punished when the preferred phase breaks down

Opportunities

  • Establish the preferred phase
  • Build repeatable offense over time

Threats

  • Alonzo Menifield changing the fight phase
  • High-impact momentum swing

In-Depth Analysis

Model favors Baraniewski
Key Advantages
  • SLpM edge (11.35 vs 3.84)
  • TDD edge (100 vs 78)
Potential Concerns
  • Limited samples reduce certainty where official UFC rates are unavailable.
  • Alonzo Menifield can outperform the model by forcing a different fight phase.
  • One high-impact exchange can override the statistical baseline.
AI Analysis

Baraniewski's early pressure and finishing form earn the lean, though Menifield's experience and counter power make the small UFC sample volatile.

Forecast

Expect Alonzo Menifield and Iwo Baraniewski to test the matchup's primary phase early. Iwo Baraniewski is projected to create the more sustainable offense, but the opposing route remains live wherever UFC sample size is thin.

Skill ratings, win probability, advantages, concerns, and forecast are AI-generated predictions based on scraped fighter profiles — not official UFC stats or guarantees.

Matchup Breakdown

Baraniewski has produced damaging offense from both striking and ground positions, but his UFC data remains concentrated in a short sample. Menifield's best path is to slow the first exchanges, defend transitions and punish aggressive entries. The estimate is an analyst-model forecast built from current UFC data and sample quality, not a market probability.

Full fight analysis

5 min read · Updated September 14, 2026

The Light Heavyweight division takes center stage at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles on September 20, 2026, as veteran Alonzo Menifield meets the surging Iwo Baraniewski. This matchup presents a fascinating clash between established divisional experience and a high-velocity newcomer. While Menifield enters as the 14 ranked contender with a record of 18-6-1, Baraniewski arrives with an undefeated 9-0-0 record. The model projects a win probability of 39 for Menifield, reflecting the volatile nature of this pairing.

Striking Volume and Impact

The striking statistics reveal a massive disparity in output between the two competitors. Iwo Baraniewski maintains a strikes landed per minute rate of 11.35, which significantly overshadows the 3.84 strikes landed per minute produced by Alonzo Menifield. However, this volume comes at a cost, as Baraniewski absorbs 8.65 strikes per minute compared to Menifield’s 3.81. Menifield utilizes his 76 inch reach to find openings, evidenced by his 11 wins by knockout and a knockdown average of 0.48. Baraniewski, despite a shorter reach of 73.5 inches, has secured 7 wins by knockout. The striking battle will likely be determined by whether Menifield can utilize his 51 percent striking defense to weather the initial storm of Baraniewski, whose significant strikes are heavily targeted at the head at a rate of 79 percent.

Grappling and Defensive Transitions

In the wrestling and grappling department, the statistical profiles suggest a high level of defensive competency. Iwo Baraniewski currently holds a takedown defense rate of 100, though this is calculated over a very short average fight time of 00:56. Alonzo Menifield brings a more tested takedown defense of 78 percent and a submission average of 0.19. Menifield has successfully navigated grappling exchanges to secure 3 wins by submission throughout his career. Baraniewski, utilizing a Judo style, has earned 2 wins by submission, showing he is capable of finishing the fight if it hits the canvas. The model notes that Menifield's best path involves defending transitions and punishing aggressive entries, especially since Baraniewski has yet to be taken down in his limited UFC sample. The wrestling ratings of 61 for Menifield and 65 for Baraniewski suggest a competitive parity on the mats.

Pace and Durability Factors

The conditioning and durability metrics highlight a significant age gap, with Menifield at 38 and Baraniewski at 27. Menifield has a much longer average fight time of 07:24, suggesting he is more accustomed to the pacing of a standard three-round contest. In contrast, Baraniewski’s finish rate of 100 percent has resulted in an extremely brief average fight time of 00:56. This creates a scenario where Baraniewski’s cardio, rated at 69, remains largely untested in deep waters. Menifield also holds a cardio rating of 69 but has 4 wins by decision to his name, proving he can maintain his Freestyle style over a longer duration. Durability could be a factor as Menifield holds a chin durability rating of 71, while Baraniewski is rated lower at 61, potentially making the newcomer vulnerable to Menifield's counter power.

Strategic Paths to Victory

For Alonzo Menifield, the objective is to slow the first exchanges and force the fight into a secondary phase where his experience can shine. With a finish rate of 78 percent, Menifield remains dangerous, but he must avoid the early pressure that defines Baraniewski’s approach. Baraniewski’s path to victory is rooted in his early pressure and finishing form, as he seeks to maintain his perfect record of finishing every opponent he has faced. The model suggests that Baraniewski is projected to create the more sustainable offense if he can maintain his striking accuracy and volume. However, the potential concern remains that one high-impact exchange from Menifield can override the statistical baseline, particularly if he can exploit Baraniewski’s 53 percent striking defense during an aggressive entry.

Model Analysis and Sample Quality

The analytical forecast emphasizes that limited samples reduce certainty where official UFC rates are unavailable. Iwo Baraniewski’s data is concentrated in a very short sample, which makes his 11.35 strikes landed per minute and 100 percent takedown defense highly volatile metrics. The model views Baraniewski as the more likely victor due to his finishing form, but recognizes that Menifield can outperform the model by forcing a different fight phase. Menifield’s striking rating of 72 and wrestling rating of 61 provide a solid foundation, but they are statistically lower than Baraniewski’s striking rating of 88 and wrestling rating of 65. Ultimately, the estimate is an analyst-model forecast built from current UFC data and sample quality, acknowledging that Menifield's experience at the highest level remains a live variable.

Model verdict

The model leans toward Iwo Baraniewski based on his 100 percent finish rate and exceptional striking volume of 11.35 strikes landed per minute. However, the 39 win probability for Alonzo Menifield reflects the danger posed by a veteran with 11 wins by knockout and a 76 inch reach. While Baraniewski’s early pressure is projected to be the deciding factor, the thin UFC sample size for the younger fighter introduces significant volatility. Menifield’s ability to defend takedowns at a 78 percent rate and his superior average fight time of 07:24 suggest he is the more reliable choice if the bout extends beyond the first round.

Frequently asked questions

How do the fighters compare in terms of finishing ability?
Iwo Baraniewski holds a 100 percent finish rate, having won all 9 of his professional bouts by either knockout or submission. Alonzo Menifield also possesses high finishing power with a 78 percent finish rate, including 11 wins by knockout and 3 wins by submission.
What are the key physical advantages in this matchup?
Alonzo Menifield holds a reach advantage with 76 inches compared to 73.5 inches for Iwo Baraniewski. In terms of height, Baraniewski is slightly taller at 184 cm, while Menifield stands at 183 cm. The age difference is notable, with Baraniewski being 27 and Menifield being 38.
What does the statistical model highlight as the main concern?
The primary concern is the limited sample size for Iwo Baraniewski, whose average fight time is only 00:56. This lack of data reduces certainty in his long-term rates, meaning a single high-impact exchange from Menifield could easily override the current statistical baseline.

Informational analysis generated from public statistics and screened by automated quality checks. Not wagering advice.

More from this card

Other published long-form breakdowns from the same event.

Picks Terminal Weekly

A tactical UFC briefing — Monday previews, Friday updates.

Every Monday: the full card preview, key matchups, and the model's forecast. Every Friday: fresh updates as fight night approaches. Free, no fluff, one-click unsubscribe.