The Oriental Sports Center in Shanghai serves as the backdrop for a compelling Flyweight encounter at UFC Fight Night: Nurmagomedov vs Song on August 29, 2026. Both Bilal Hasan and Nilson Rojas enter the octagon with identical 9-0-0 professional records, representing a clash of undefeated prospects looking to establish their standing. While both athletes share a similar MMA style, the statistical profile suggests a matchup defined by contrasting offensive efficiencies and physical dimensions.
Striking Efficiency and Impact
Bilal Hasan enters this contest with a significant striking rating of 95, characterized by a highly accurate offensive output. His striking accuracy percentage sits at 81, a figure that underscores his precision in the pocket. With a knockdown average of 20 and a strikes landed per minute rate of 28, Hasan demonstrates the ability to generate high-volume pressure. Conversely, Nilson Rojas carries a striking rating of 50. While Rojas has secured 7 wins by knockout, matching Hasan’s total in that category, his statistical output in terms of strikes landed per minute is not yet established in the available data. Hasan’s ability to land 81 percent of his significant strikes to the head suggests a focused, high-impact approach that Rojas must navigate carefully to avoid an early deficit in the exchange.
Physical Dimensions and Range Control
The physical breakdown of this Flyweight bout reveals a slight advantage for Bilal Hasan in terms of height and reach. Standing at 170 centimeters, Hasan holds a 5-centimeter height advantage over the 165-centimeter Nilson Rojas. Furthermore, Hasan possesses a reach of 70 inches, providing him with the necessary length to manage distance against the shorter opponent. At age 25, Hasan is the slightly younger competitor compared to the 27-year-old Rojas. This reach advantage is particularly relevant given Hasan's striking accuracy; he can theoretically utilize his 70-inch reach to maintain the 81 percent striking accuracy from a safer distance. Rojas will need to overcome the height deficit to implement his own MMA-based game plan, as he lacks a recorded reach measurement to counter Hasan's established length.
Grappling and Defensive Baselines
In the wrestling and defensive departments, the two fighters show closer parity. Both Bilal Hasan and Nilson Rojas share a takedown defense rating of 70, suggesting a competent level of resistance against being grounded. Hasan holds a wrestling rating of 48, while Rojas is slightly higher at 50. Despite these ratings, Hasan’s takedown average is recorded at 0, indicating a heavy preference for standing exchanges rather than offensive grappling. His submission average also stands at 0, though he does have 1 win by submission on his record. Rojas, meanwhile, has 0 wins by submission, with 2 wins by decision and 7 by knockout. The defensive metrics for Hasan show a strikes defended percentage of 57, which will be tested by Rojas's ability to force a different fight phase than the one Hasan prefers.
Durability and Finish Potential
The finishing capabilities of both men are a primary focal point of this analysis. Bilal Hasan boasts a finish rate percentage of 89, supported by an average fight time of only 00:45. This suggests a fighter who seeks to end confrontations immediately, often before the first minute concludes. His chin durability is rated at 79, providing a solid buffer against incoming fire. Nilson Rojas maintains a finish rate percentage of 78, and while he has not suffered any losses by knockout, submission, or decision, his chin durability rating of 70 is slightly lower than his opponent's. With 7 wins by knockout for each fighter, the potential for a high-impact exchange to override the statistical baseline is significant. Hasan’s tendency to target the head with 81 percent of his strikes aligns with his high finish rate.
Pace and Cardio Considerations
Cardio and sustained output may become the deciding factors if the fight transcends the opening minutes. Bilal Hasan holds a cardio rating of 84, which is notably higher than the 70 rating attributed to Nilson Rojas. Given that Hasan’s average fight time is a brief 00:45, his ability to maintain his 28 strikes landed per minute over a longer duration remains a projection rather than a proven certainty. Rojas, with 2 wins by decision compared to Hasan’s 1 win by decision, may have more experience navigating deeper waters, despite his lower cardio rating. However, Hasan’s superior strikes defended percentage of 57 and his higher striking rating suggest he is better equipped to dictate the pace. The model suggests Hasan is projected to create the more sustainable offense over the scheduled distance.
Model verdict
The model leans toward Bilal Hasan with a 56 percent win probability, primarily driven by his superior striking accuracy of 81 percent and a higher finish rate percentage of 89. Hasan’s ability to dictate the preferred phase using his 70-inch reach and 170-centimeter frame provides a more repeatable statistical route to victory. While Nilson Rojas remains a live threat due to his 7 knockout wins and identical 9-0-0 record, the lack of established UFC rate statistics for Rojas moderates the certainty of an upset. The leading projection is Bilal Hasan by decision or a later finish, provided he maintains his defensive baseline of 57 percent strikes defended.
Frequently asked questions
- What are the primary statistical advantages for Bilal Hasan?
- Bilal Hasan holds a striking accuracy percentage of 81 and a strikes landed per minute rate of 28. He also possesses a height advantage at 170 centimeters and a reach of 70 inches, which supports his 89 percent finish rate and 20 knockdown average.
- How does Nilson Rojas compare in terms of finishing ability?
- Nilson Rojas has a finish rate percentage of 78, with 7 of his wins coming via knockout. Although his striking rating is 50 compared to Hasan's 95, Rojas has proven his ability to end fights, having never lost in 9 professional bouts.
- What role does fight duration play in this matchup?
- Bilal Hasan has a very short average fight time of 00:45, suggesting he starts fast. However, his cardio rating of 84 is higher than Rojas's 70, suggesting he is better statistically equipped for a longer bout, even though Rojas has more decision wins.
Informational analysis generated from public statistics and screened by automated quality checks. Not wagering advice.
Standing24%
Clinch0%
Ground76%